TẠP CHÍ KHOA HỌC YERSIN

YERSIN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE

ISSN: 2525 - 2372

Góc nhìn đa chiều về mô hình, các công cụ hoạch định, các cấp độ và các rào cản cho sự lựa chọn chiến lược trong tổ chức

  • File: Tải bài viết
  • Title: A multi-dimensional perspective on models of strategy, planning tools, level of strategies and barriers to strategic choice in organizations
  • Ngày nhận bài: 01/09/2020
  • Ngày xét duyệt: 01/10/2020
  • Ngày xuất bản: 01/11/2020
  • Tác giả: Lê Thanh Hà, Cao Quốc Việt
  • Trang: 22 - 30

Tóm tắt

Nghiên cứu này tổng hợp các quan điểm trái chiều về các mô hình chiến lược, các công cụ hoạch định chiến lược, các cấp độ chiến lược và một số các rào cản về sự lựa chọn chiến lược trong các tổ chức. Những lập luận ủng hộ và phản đối khác nhau sẽ cho thấy các ưu điểm, tồn tại của các mô hình và công cụ. Từ đó, các nhà nghiên cứu, nhà quản trị sẽ có một nền tảng lý thuyết phản ánh góc nhìn đa chiều để áp dụng vào nghiên cứu lý thuyết cũng như nghiên cứu ứng dụng trong thực tiễn hoạt động kinh doanh của các doanh nghiệp.

Abstract

This paper combines conflicting views on strategic models, strategic planning tools, strategic levels, and some of the barriers to the strategic choice of organizations. Various supporting and opposing arguments will show the advantages and shortcomings of the models and tools. Based on this analysis, researchers and managers will have a theoretical background that reflects multi-dimensional perspectives to apply in academic research as well as applied research in the practical operations of enterprises.

Từ khóa

Mô hình chiến lược, các công cụ, các cấp độ chiến lược

Tài liệu tham khảo

Acedo, FJ, Barroso, C and Galan, JL (2006) The resource-based theory: dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 621–36.

Armstrong, CE and Shimizu, K (2007) A review of approaches to empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 33(6), 959–86.

Brandenburger, AM and Nalebuff, BJ (1996) Co-opetition. Doubleday: New York.

Burnes, B. (2004). Managing change: A strategic approach to organisational dynamics. Pearson Education.

Corradi, G, Gherardi, S and Verzelloni, L (2010) Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Management Learning, 41(3), 265–83.

Dawson, P (2011) The contribution of the processual approach to the theory and practice of organizational change. In DM Boje, B Burnes and J Hassard (eds): The Routledge Companion to Organizational Change. London: Routledge.

Dyer, H (1996) Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), 271–91.

Faulkner, D, Teerikangas, S and Joseph, RJ (eds) (2012) The Handbook of Mergers and Acquisitions. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Fleisher, CS and Bensoussan, BE (2003) Strategic and Competitive Analysis: Methods and techniques for analysing business competition. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Furrer, O, Thomas, H and Goussevskaia, A (2008) The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: a content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 1–23.

Gilbert, RJ and Newbery, DMG (1982) Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. American Economic Review, 72, 514–26.

Guillen, MF (2000) Business groups in emerging economies: a resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 362–80.

Hamel, G and Prahalad, CK (1994) Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.

Jarzabkowski, P and Kaplan, S (2015) Strategy tools-in-use: a framework for understanding ‘technologies of rationality’ in practice. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 537–58.

Johnson, G, Whittington, R, Scholes, K, Angwin, D and Regnér, P (2014) Exploring Corporate Strategy (10th edition). Pearson: Harlow.

Joyce, P (2015) Strategic Leadership in the Public Sector. Routledge: London.

 

Leitner, K-H and Güldenberg, S (2010) Generic strategies and firm performance in SMEs: a longitudinal study of Austrian SMEs. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 169–89.

Lin, Y and Wu, L-Y (2014) Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 407–13.

Lynch, R (2015) Strategic Management. Pearson: Harlow.

McNeilly, MR (2012) Sun Tzu and the Art of Business. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Mintzberg, H, Ahlstrand, B and Lampel, J (2009) Strategy Safari (2nd edition). Pearson: Harlow.

Newbert, SL (2007) Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 121–46.

Porter, ME (1985) Competitive Advantage. Free Press: New York.

Rigby, D and Bilodeau, B (2013) Management Tools and Trends 2013. Bain & Company: Boston, MA.

Schoenberg, R, Collier, N and Bowman, C (2013) Strategies for business turnaround and recovery: a review and synthesis. European Business Review, 25(3), 243–62.

Shapiro, C (1989) The theory of business strategy. RAND Journal of Economics, 20(1), 125–37.

Speed, RJ (1996) Oh Mr Porter! A re-appraisal of competitive strategy. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 7(5–6), 8–11.

Turner, I (1990) Strategy and organisation. Manager Update, 1(3), 1–10.

von Clausewitz, C, von Ghyczy, T, von Oetinger, C and Bassford, C (2001) Clausewitz on Strategy: Inspiration and insight from a master strategist. Wiley: Chichester.

Whittington, R and Vaara, E (2012) Strategy-as-Practice: Taking Social Practices Seriously. Academy of Management Annals, 62(1), 285–336.

Đăng ký/Đăng Nhập
Tìm kiếm